Talk:Buddhology

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Religion / Interfaith  
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by Interfaith work group.
 
WikiProject Buddhism (Rated C-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. Please participate by editing the article Buddhology, or visit the project page for more details on the projects.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

I have just laid out a few topics here. As I suggested on the Buddha - God or Man talk page, it would seem to be a good idea to construct the article in a sandbox first.--Stephen Hodge 01:38, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

Hi Stephen, the first reference was all mixed up, placing the citation of "whoever sees the dhamma sees me" at Kh.XXII.87(13), which, obviously, was incorrect (there are only 9 sections to the Khuddakapatha, and none of them contain this phrase). I corrected it to the SN Khandha Samyutta; Vakkali sutta with two citation strategies, the first refering to volume, chapter, sutta number in chapter (sutta number by section in parentheses), the second being PTS Roman indexing by volume and page number. That should help folks find the passage. -- Vacchagotta 15:59, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

who uses "buddhology"?[edit]

and if someone uses it, it should be about Buddha the concept, not Gautama Buddha (common errors that are corrected after studying buddhology 101)--Esteban Barahona (talk) 04:19, 9 September 2008 (UTC)