Talk:Cambridge University Press v. Becker

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

2012 categories[edit]

Since this case has not yet been decided (although summary judgment was granted on vicarious and direct liability), I do not think it belongs in the case law categories or the copyright case law list. PacificWonderland (talk) 20:05, 5 March 2012 (UTC)


Consider adding this seal to the infobox as it is in the public domain (U.S. federal government produced): Boaltie (talk) 19:34, 5 March 2012 (UTC)


There are some lingering tense issues that the case goes from present to past tense.Boaltie (talk) 19:30, 5 March 2012 (UTC)


I think the amended complaint/answer are more useful as references. I recommend removing the original complaint/answer entirely. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Boaltie (talkcontribs) 20:09, 2 March 2012 (UTC)