This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kylie Minogue, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Kylie Minogue and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
The video section contains this claim: "It was considered largely responsible for the song gaining rapid airplay in each territory in which it was released." This needs a citation if it's going to stay; purely on the face of it, this seems unlikely, as at this point a new Kylie song was likely to get rapid airplay in lots of territories owing to her existing high profile. It might be true in the US (for instance), but again, we'd need an actual citation. I'll likely remove this sentence in a week or so if one doesn't emerge. Gusworld 08:54, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
No takers, so I've removed the offending sentence. Gusworld 16:51, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
In about late 2001-early 2002 I saw couple of times some animated music video on VH1 that featured certain images influenced by Kylie's "Can't Get You Out of My Head" music video that featured a female dressed in look-alike white suit. Can anybody remember that video? I need to recall performer and title. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ledpoison1 (talk • contribs) 10:07, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
Sales for France are wrong. A platinum equals to 250.000 copie. Look here. --2811Butterfly (talk) 12:19, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
you should check all certifications in Europe, have entered the albums sales not singles --2811Butterfly (talk) 12:24, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
Ok, I read through it. In the top left hand corner of the first page of this document, it says "Updated March 2011". Are you sure that these certification levels were the same in 2001/2002? I Help, When I Can. 12:31, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
While it's natural to have the pull quote at the top of a section, the content of the quote is referenced in the second paragraph. I'd suggest moving the quote box down there, or perhaps even making it an indented quote in the actual text.
There's a start, a few more sections yet to be read/reviewed, and then of course a reference check. -- Zanimum (talk) 18:33, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
Mostly an "all clear" from Checklinks. They only find six "Uncategorized redirects", all the of the rest of the sites are still alive and ticking. Basically, just follow the links on this results page, and use those URLs as the replacement. The new URL is usually just a few character different. -- Zanimum (talk) 18:58, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
Any chance you can find any stats for Canada, for this section or "Charts"?
Nope, I tried a lot of sources and I couldn't find anything. Maybe it didn't chart in the country. I even checked the Canadian certifications database, and the song doesn't seem to have any certification, pretty unlikely for a song like this, so maybe it didn't chart after all. --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 14:15, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
I'm wondering if "Noughties" should be wikilinked? Even though I recognized it, I'm not sure how universal this term is.
Okay I wikilinked it. I don't think I can change the word as it is the name of the list. --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 14:15, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
Images, sound licensing Passing.
References Seem to all be in order. -- Zanimum (talk) 18:38, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
Curious that it's not in the Canadian certifications database. I'm certain that it was featured in CHUM FM television ads for a while. Anyway, I can't say you didn't try to look.
Everything seems to be in order, otherwise, so passing! -- Zanimum (talk) 21:50, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
Thank you so so much for conducting such a clean and useful review! The nomination had been lying around for so long I thought it might end up in the backlog! Thanks for taking up the review again! --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 05:19, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.