Talk:1917 Canadian federal election

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Canada: Governments Mid‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Governments of Canada.

Untitled[edit]

How can this be called a "snap election" when it was held six years after the previous election? It was more of a "long-awaited election" than a snap election. Ground Zero 14:32, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Yes, a "drag election". I think this was added and thinking of the "snap election" as an "unusually timed" election, since this election was held one year later than expected. I'd support the removal of this article from the List of snap elections in Canada and Category:Snap elections, since a snap election refers to an election called much earlier than expected, but I think I understand why it was added on. --Death phoenix 15:11, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I believe, not certain though, that even though this election was 6 years after the previous one, and the normal maximum is 5 years, the agreement/bill (not sure what) that allowed the government to postpone the election beyond 5 years did not specify a date, or it was beyond 1917, so even though it was 6 years later it was earlier than neccessary or probably expected (people probably expected the election to be put off as long as possible. This is just my ideas, not certain, mainly an edjucated guess based on facts and if anyone knows more please tell me what is wrong.say1988 June 30, 2005 17:53 (UTC)

Perhaps it was a "snap election" since everyone thought the election would not be held until the war was over?

You've put forward various interesting ideas on why it might have been added. I am removing this from the category not because your ideas are invalid, but only because so far we don't have anything concrete -- just speculation. Thanks again. Ground Zero | t 14:28, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]