This article is within the scope of WikiProject Photography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of photography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Took a photo of the Canon EF 17-40mm f/4L USM. I feel that this photo is sharper, has a wider DOF, and better represents the lens. If anyone else feels that this is a correct presumption, post a comment to let me know, and I will update the article. Thanks! Nebrot 21:58, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
Paragraph 2 is really just an opinion. Its not truly encyclopedic. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 22.214.171.124 (talk) 02:04, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
This is true. I find that some of the EF lens pages contain not only babble, but some read like advertising. Nebrot (talk) 07:52, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
The 'Audience' section has a good opening paragraph, in my opinion, but does veer into the realm of advertising a little after that. Not a bad thing, necessarily. The bit I didn't like was the title: Audience. Seems very odd to me. nagualdesign (talk) 06:02, 3 November 2011 (UTC)