Talk:Canonical model

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Talk:Canonical Model)
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Computing (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Move?[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 02:55, 19 December 2013 (UTC)


  • not a proper noun and I have moved the disam page to make way for the tech move. Thanks. ukexpat (talk) 21:18, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
  • The page now at Canonical Model looks to be entirely about information architecture. How do you want to handle that? One could suggest that the present page should be renamed Canonical model (design pattern) or Canonical model (information architecture). It seems unlikely that the IA sense of the term is the primary topic of 'canonical model' since it is so specialized. It is arguable that the DAB page should be at 'Canonical model.' In my opinion this could still be done as a technical move if the obvious questions are addressed. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 22:09, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
  • I support this move as it makes sense as explained. DeistCosmos (talk) 07:10, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
  • Support any move away from Canonical Model as it is not a proper noun.--ukexpat (talk) 15:12, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
  • Support but it should have been a technical request as there is no possible controversy here. Dicklyon (talk) 08:39, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.