Talk:Cardiac arrest

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Physiology (Rated Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article has not yet been associated with a particular area.
 
WikiProject Medicine / Cardiology (Rated B-class, High-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that this article follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.
B-Class article B  This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Cardiology task force (marked as Top-importance).
 

cardiac embarrassment[edit]

Dear sir/madam, I am searching the topic 'cardiac embarrassment',which is connected to something like mediastinal shifting after a pulmonary surgery.I have searched many sites but could not get the topic in detail & in a better manner.It seems the topic is not an highlighted one,but my curiosity for this search topic is increasing.I would like you to include this topic on your site,as your site shows detailed and thorough information about any topic. Kindly do look into this matter.Looking forward to see this topic on your site. Thanking you in anticipation. Yours truly, site member.

Pijkuoi

Recent RCT questions benefit of hypothermia[edit]

How should we combine this? Have added one sentence.

Nielsen, Niklas; Wetterslev, Jørn; Cronberg, Tobias; Erlinge, David; Gasche, Yvan; Hassager, Christian; Horn, Janneke; Hovdenes, Jan; Kjaergaard, Jesper; Kuiper, Michael; Pellis, Tommaso; Stammet, Pascal; Wanscher, Michael; Wise, Matt P.; Åneman, Anders; Al-Subaie, Nawaf; Boesgaard, Søren; Bro-Jeppesen, John; Brunetti, Iole; Bugge, Jan Frederik; Hingston, Christopher D.; Juffermans, Nicole P.; Koopmans, Matty; Køber, Lars; Langørgen, Jørund; Lilja, Gisela; Møller, Jacob Eifer; Rundgren, Malin; Rylander, Christian; Smid, Ondrej; Werer, Christophe; Winkel, Per; Friberg, Hans (17 November 2013). "Targeted Temperature Management at 33°C versus 36°C after Cardiac Arrest". New England Journal of Medicine: 131117131833001. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1310519. 

The size of this trial is twice as big as the combined number of patients in the previous systematic review. [1]

Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 22:37, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

In my opinion, the NEJM is the best (most reliable) medical journal. As such, I am fairly relaxed about using its (primary) RCT conclusions in Wikipedia's articles. In this case, it should be single sentence after the Cochrane finding, stating that a major RCT showed a different conclusion. Axl ¤ [Talk] 00:06, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
Agree which is more or less what I have done. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 00:09, 19 November 2013 (UTC)