This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Dear sir/madam, I am searching the topic 'cardiac embarrassment',which is connected to something like mediastinal shifting after a pulmonary surgery.I have searched many sites but could not get the topic in detail & in a better manner.It seems the topic is not an highlighted one,but my curiosity for this search topic is increasing.I would like you to include this topic on your site,as your site shows detailed and thorough information about any topic. Kindly do look into this matter.Looking forward to see this topic on your site. Thanking you in anticipation. Yours truly, site member.
In my opinion, the NEJM is the best (most reliable) medical journal. As such, I am fairly relaxed about using its (primary) RCT conclusions in Wikipedia's articles. In this case, it should be single sentence after the Cochrane finding, stating that a major RCT showed a different conclusion. Axl ¤ [Talk] 00:06, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
Agree which is more or less what I have done. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 00:09, 19 November 2013 (UTC)