Talk:Cargolux Flight 7933

Incorrect information and irrelevant details

1. The lemma is highly unspecific and also wrong (see next item).
2. The flight number is incorrectly stated throughout the article (and of no relevance at all).
3. The event is categorized by Wikipedia as an accident, while it was officially categorized as a serious incident.
4. The aircraft did not land on the vehicle. It touched it during the flare and landed on the runway.
5. There was nobody onboard the van, when it was hit by the aircraft's wheel.
6. Nobody was injured.
7. The maintenance crew working on the runway centre line lights consisted of two people.
8. There were 5 survivors, not just 3.

Apart from that, this article is full of irrelevant details like

• the Boeing customer code
• the SCD suffix
• the aircraft registration (acceptable, however, if used in lieu of the flight number)
• the manufacturer's serial number
• the line number
• the first flight date
• the delivery date
• the legs flown the day before

Who cares?

This is all pseudo-information, which does not add anything to the article.

The paramount question is whether this incident is relevant enough for inclusion.

I suggest deleting it.

--88.207.202.40 (talk) 19:08, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

While I agree that much of the information listed above, is not required in an aviation near accident article, I do not agree that it is "pseudo" information. "Pseudo" means "false" and though much of it is trivia information that doesn't add anything of value to the article, it is not false information.

I oppose deleting the article. While it actually amounted to a "serious incident" (it was reclassified in the final report from "accident" to "serious incident"), it is still quite notable for inclusion in the Wiki category of aviation accidents and incidents, because it was a very close call. The end result could have been the loss of one of the world's largest aircraft because of communications errors with ATC, which was the cause of the Tenerife runway collision, that resulted in the loss of 583 lives. EditorASC (talk) 11:11, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Cargolux Flight 7933. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090423074834/http://www.aviation-photography.lu:80/cargolux.htm to http://www.aviation-photography.lu/cargolux.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 13:03, 26 February 2016 (UTC)