Talk:Cascade hop

please give suggestions about this article. what do you think?

This is Jason and i was wondering if anyone knows how to do inline citation? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.248.242.17 (talk) 02:26, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have edited the page to show you how to do inline notations. This should also help Help:Footnotes -- JudgeNik

I think the alpha acid level is too low. the last three times that i bought cascade the alpha was over 8 as of 17 march 2011. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.131.0.194 (talk) 19:31, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Singular[edit]

Why is this article's title in singular whereas all the other hop varieties are in plural, e.g. Saaz hops and Amarillo hops? --87.144.121.248 (talk) 00:18, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

First Usage[edit]

The article currently says that New Albion brewing was the first to commercially use this hop as an aroma variety in 1976. I think that's wrong because Anchor used it as the only hop in their Liberty Ale in 1975. That straight from my discussions with master brewer Mark Carpenter, their page for Liberty ale (http://www.anchorbrewing.com/beer/liberty_ale), and their deeper discussion of the beer (http://www.anchorbrewing.com/blog/ask-bob-brewer-is-liberty-ale-an-apa-or-an-ipa/). So it seems like Anchor at least thinks that they used the hop before New Albion. I haven't been able to find an independent source on the topic, though. Slobrewer (talk) 04:33, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Cascade hop. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:03, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Cascade hop. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090629071051/http://www.usahops.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=hop_info&pageID=8 to http://www.usahops.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=hop_info&pageID=8
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.hops.com.au/products/australian_varieties/cascade.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.nzhops.co.nz/varieties/pdf/new_zealand_cascade.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:23, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]