Talk:Cascading failure

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Energy (Rated Start-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 

The contents of Cascade failure and Cascading failure are practically the same. No reason (in my mind, anyways) why they shouldn't be merged. If anyone has any ideas on this, your input would be greatly appreciated, thank you.  :oD N Yo FACE 11:54, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Cascade failure and cascading failure are the same concept. I prefer the term cascading failure. The text in the current cascade failure entry is a little clearer.

Agreed -- the articles should be merged. --Vishahu 00:20, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

Agreed. Indeed, I found the cascade failure first and only found cascading failure by accident after seeing the source of the animated image. Since there appears to be consensus that these articles be merged and cascading failure is the preferred term, I shall merge them. --Sroc (talk) 12:40, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

I don't know much about this subject, but the examples under 'biology' and 'electronics' about glass photomultiplier tubes seems to be a different kind of failure than most of the examples described in the article. Everything else refers to the failures of nodes due to increased load to take up the slack for an initial failed node, like taking one support out of a structure and causing the remaining supports to be overloaded. However, especially this example about photomultiplier tubes is talking about how the failure of one component has a direct, in this case, kinetic effect on remaining components, like dominoes. It was the failure of the photomultiplier tube itself which caused the other ones to fail, and not the redistribution of load to other tubes. Is this still a legitimate case of cascading failure? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 18.33.1.251 (talk) 19:42, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Article being used by blog comment spammers[edit]

I don't have time to check, but this article is very likely being used by blog comment spammers. I just removed over 60 spam comments referring to this article from a blog I manage, and I know many other blog owners who have had to do the same thing. It's likely have one of the links in this article refers to a product, service, or something else those responsible for the comment spam will profit or gain from. Those contributing to this article should probably take a close look at all the links and references in this article. -- Gmatsuda (talk) 05:51, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Autoimmune Polyglandular Failure syndrome[edit]

I think that we could include, in cascading failure in biological systems, the polyglandular failure, or autoimmune polyglandular failure syndrome. ICD-10 Chapter IV: Endocrine, nutritional and metabolic diseases E31.0 Autoimmune polyglandular failure, a.k.a. Schmidt syndrome

MaynardClark (talk) 03:43, 22 October 2014 (UTC)