Talk:Cell signaling
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| WikiProject Molecular and Cellular Biology | (Rated B-Class, Top-importance) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||
| WikiProject Cell Signaling | (Rated Start-Class, Top-importance) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||
What about signaling in plant cells (especilay local signaling)? I propose this article be deleted, and re-directed to signal transduction.
- That's probably a good idea. For now, I have put a "merge" tag on the article. I'm not sure there is anything here that isn't in the signal transduction article, but the tag may at least encourage others to take a look before a redirect is created. Edgar181 11:46, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Merge proposal 2006
Three cell biology textbooks (see References section) use the terms Cell signaling, Cell communication or Cell-to-cell signaling as titles for chapters about how cells communicate. Wikipedia also has Intercellular communication. I suggest that the "Cell signaling" and "Intercellular communication" articles be merged into Cell signaling. Data in the table below show that "Cell signaling" is used most often in Wikipedia. --JWSchmidt 21:02, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
| possible name | hits in Wikipedia | hits in Entrez database | Google hits | yahoo hits |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cell signaling | 166 | 5,152 | 5,420,000 | 1,830,000 |
| Cell communication | 43 | 17,096 | 1,280,000 | 497,000 |
| Cell-to-cell signaling | 2 | 214 | 40,600 | 19,800 |
| Intercellular communication | 28 | 2,661 | 334,000 | 203,000 |
[edit] Merge proposal Nov 2007
This new proposal is about merging Cell signaling into the Signal transduction article.
- Possibly concur: I have not read the content, hence possibly (sorry, busy elsewhere). Both articles are pretty long, however. The differences is this one contains also hydrophobic ligand signalling which is goes directly to the nucleus. If it is a daughting tax of merging, it should be proposed as article of the month. --Squidonius (talk) 22:47, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
- oppose. Both articles are in good shape and long enough. Putting them together would create a mega article.-- Mdd (talk) 22:52, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
- wow. Quick answer! MCB portal is allways dead. Some material is duplicated so this merger must be resolved by writing in both how they differ: making one referenced in the text of the other would be idea and trimming the repetitions. A warning: mega articles get split up and are not a problem, see molecular biology, Influenza or DNA microarray: hence this should just be a quasi list of signalling pathways and general considerations. --Squidonius (talk) 23:18, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
- First. I made a new header here to make clear where we are talking about.
- It just seems to me (as an outsider) that the two articles can stay separate. Cell signaling is a specific type of Signal transduction!? -- Mdd (talk) 23:33, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
Salwateama2008 (talk) 07:47, 24 April 2008 (UTC) i think cell signaling must merge with the signal transduction because it is the introducction ,to the signal transduction topics thank you
- I am closing this merge proposal due to lack of activity (10 months and two votes). The two articles are reasonable articles and are not about the same subject. Cell signaling is a broad article about the process, signal transduction is an article about a component/step of the process. Where the former may discuss related issues to the process (stimulation, signal production, research, &c.), the latter would not. --Oldak Quill 17:53, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
[edit] c-signaling
The page doesn't discuss c-signaling. We can't list all signaling but c-signaling does seem rather an important one. What do others think?Mccready (talk) 04:04, 15 February 2009 (UTC)