Talk:Cellarette

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articleCellarette was one of the Agriculture, food and drink good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 2, 2020Good article nomineeListed
February 25, 2023Good article reassessmentDelisted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on April 28, 2014.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that cellarettes were designed with 3-D optical illusion art to conceal their illegal alcoholic beverages during prohibition in the United States?
Current status: Delisted good article
WikiProject iconWine Unassessed (inactive)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Wine, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.WineWikipedia:WikiProject WineTemplate:WikiProject WineWine articles
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

GA Review[edit]

GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Cellarette/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: No Great Shaker (talk · contribs) 04:30, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Commencing review[edit]

  1. Well written: the prose is clear and concise.
  2. Well written: the spelling and grammar are correct.
  3. Complies with the MOS guidelines for lead sections.
  4. Complies with the MOS guidelines for article structure and layout.
  5. Complies with the MOS guidelines for words to watch.
  6. Complies with the MOS guidelines for writing about fiction – not applicable.
  7. Complies with the MOS guidelines for list incorporation – not applicable.
  8. Complies with the MOS guidelines for use of quotations.
  9. All statements are verifiable with inline citations provided.
  10. All inline citations are from reliable sources, etc.
  11. Contains a list of all references in accordance with the layout style guideline.
  12. No original research.
  13. No copyright violations or plagiarism.
  14. Broad in its coverage but within scope and in summary style.
  15. Neutral.
  16. Stable.
  17. Illustrated, if possible.
  18. Images are at least fair use and do not breach copyright.

Hello, Doug. I'll be doing this review within the current GAN Backlog Drive and will use the checklist above to register progress. Hope to provide some feedback soon. No Great Shaker (talk) 04:30, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On hold[edit]

This is a very interesting article for me to review as I enjoy woodwork myself, but hardly to this standard, and I have been known to appreciate a bottle of wine now and again. There are a few points to consider:

  • I made a few minor tweaks as I went through and I hope those are okay.
  • Some extra citations are needed to comply with WP:V – see tags.
  • The narrative spans the period from 15th century Europe to Prohibition but there is nothing about cellarette design and production in the last ninety years. Another paragraph about recent and contemporary work would round things off.
 Working --Doug Coldwell (talk) 10:52, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Added: Cellarette use declined in the 20th century due to the use of the refrigerator. --Doug Coldwell (talk) 12:12, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • I would drop the "see also" section because cabinetry is already linked and I think there is only a tenuous connection between a cellarette and a bar.

Excellent use of imagery. Well written and no problems with OR/POV. It's nearly there and I'll put it on hold for the time being. No Great Shaker (talk) 05:48, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@No Great Shaker: All issues have been addressed. Can you take another look. Thanks. --Doug Coldwell (talk) 12:12, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Passed[edit]

Well, we do need fridges, but the cellarette remains a nice piece of furniture and I'd have one myself at the right price. The amendments are fine and I'm promoting this to GA. It's the first one I've passed as part of this GAN drive. Well done, Doug. No Great Shaker (talk) 14:51, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright contributor investigation and Good article reassessment[edit]

This article is part of Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/20210315 and the Good article (GA) drive to reassess and potentially delist over 200 GAs that might contain copyright and other problems. An AN discussion closed with consensus to delist this group of articles en masse, unless a reviewer opens an independent review and can vouch for/verify content of all sources. Please review Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/February 2023 for further information about the GA status of this article, the timeline and process for delisting, and suggestions for improvements. Questions or comments can be made at the project talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:36, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Globe bars[edit]

Globe Bars seem to be a thing of their own as a sub topic. I didn’t spot a mention.

https://www.google.com/search?q=globe+bar 2A00:23C6:27BC:6701:E80E:707F:4FFD:5EBB (talk) 16:06, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Cellarette&oldid=1176416738"