From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Doesn't this seem more like an advertisement than reference information provided in an unbiased form? (talk) 21:07, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

I agree this is an advertisement and should be flagged as such Phuggins (talk) 23:38, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

I absolutely agree, and have been attempting to 'de-advertise' the page. --WillJeck (talk) 14:59, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

I also agree. The general tone of the page needs neutralization. The "Conclusion" section could be removed as well. Kmcallenberg (talk) 20:42, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

I tried to de-advertise even more.Musikutiv (talk) 12:47, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

  • This page must have been heavily edited because I don't read this as an advertisement at all. It is a very good description of a generic and effective molecular biology protocol. I found it very useful. MBCF (talk) 04:07, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
    • Shouldn't the warning be deleted? MBCF (talk) 04:11, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
  • I disagree that this page is written like an advertisement in its present form. If everyone agrees then we should remove the advertisement flag. (talk) 06:33, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
    • Unanimous, I just deleted it. MBCF (talk) 23:56, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Should there be a warning about the warning about the case of the title? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jm1234567890 (talkcontribs) 21:31, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

First sentence[edit]

The first sentence doesn't tell what kind of thing ChIP-sequencing actually is. E.g., if it is it a method, I would suggest the following: "ChIP-sequencing, also known as ChIP-seq, is a method used to analyze protein interactions with DNA." -- (talk) 00:14, 24 May 2013 (UTC)