Talk:Chadash

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Judaism Mid‑importance

	Judaism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

I had misread http://torah.org/info/copyright.html and thought it was permitted.

sorry!Rebbe 08:43, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio Fixed[edit]

- the.crazy.russian τ ç ë 18:14, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Subjectivism[edit]

The seventh paragraph of the article states: "Observance of Yoshon and Chodosh has been relatively limited until very recently (at least in Ashkenazic circles) because in Europe, and other places, kosher food was scarce to begin with, people were not able to be even more stringent on their diets. However, in America, thanks to the vast production of the American bread basket and our general prosperity..."

The part of this quote with which this discussion is concerned is the word "our".

It implies that ALL readers of Wikipedia are American.

This MUST be changed.

Beit Hamikdash already up?[edit]

Paragraph three refers to temple sacrifices in the present tense. The last person to try that got arrested by the Israeli Police. -- Jesse 68.150.5.42 17:06, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Title[edit]

The article title is back to front. since the article is about the prohibition of eating chodosh (chadash), why is the title 'Yoshon'? --Redaktor (talk) 16:35, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Since no one has objected, I am changing the title. --Redaktor (talk) 23:36, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling?[edit]

It is inconsistent through the article whether something goes yoshon or yashan/chodosh or chadash, etc. I'm uncertain whether this should be fixed, as I don't know which (or if one) is the correct transliteration.174.45.98.237 (talk) 11:04, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Warning?[edit]

There was a warning on the top of this page (please pardon me if I'm using the wrong lingo), which states: "This article improperly uses one or more religious texts as primary sources without referring to secondary sources that critically analyze them."

As to the concern regarding all sources being of religious origin: Given that the scope of this page is Jewish law, and given that the topic discussed is a fairly fine point of Jewish law, it is unlikely there exists a non-religious text or source which critically analyses the topic or the primary source as it relates to this topic. Additionally, just as it would be expected and acceptable for all sources to be British in an article on British law, it is, in context, expected and acceptable for all sources to be Jewish in an article on Jewish law.

As to the concern regarding a lack of secondary sources critically analyzing the primary source, this is simply inaccurate. The primary source for this law is the Torah. Other sources listed are Shulchan Aruch, Yoreh De'ah (which critically analyzes the Torah law), then Shulchan Aruch, HaRav (which critically analyses the ruling in Shulchan Aruch, Yoreh De'ah), then a Responsa to Shulchan Aruch HaRav.

For the above reasons, I will remove the aforementioned warning on this page. BenChessed (talk) 07:28, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Chadash. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:08, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]