Talk:Challenges to decisions of England and Wales magistrates' courts

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Better explanation[edit]

Can we please explain better case citations such as R v —X— Magistrates/Justices ex parte —Y— (or R (—Y—) v —X— Magistrates/Justices)? What actually happens in these proceedings? I (not a lawyer) am none the wiser after reading this article and the one on ex parte. – Kaihsu (talk) 13:28, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

They are examples of judicial review. ElectricLemon (talk) 18:54, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Challenges to decisions of England and Wales magistrates' courts. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:41, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]