This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hong Kong, a project to coordinate efforts in improving all Hong Kong-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Hong Kong-related articles, you are invited to join this project.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject East Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of East Asia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Mechansim § indicates exhaustion of available oxygen which is incorrect. It is rather the increase in concentration of CO that results in poisoning as hemoglobin binds CO much more efficiently than it does O2. Also in other, presumably traumatic methods, it is the fear of the associated trauma that must be overcome, death is the same in any case. Also, I don't believe a suffocation reaction accompanies CO poisoning (as it does in C02 poisoning) when breathing is not impaired .184.108.40.206 (talk) 05:56, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
Suicide by charcoal has been around a while. It is discussed in an 1844 novel, The Wandering Jew, by Eugene Sue, himself a physician, at Part III, Book IX, Chapters 31 and 32. Accidental death by charcoal is reported almost every winter in the papers, as unknowing people attempt to heat with charcoal. Since charcoal has been in use for very many centuries, one suspects that both the ignorance for accidental death and the knowledge for suicide have also been around a good while. As for the mechanism, Chapter 33 mentions that it is by toxic gas. Jm546 (talk) 22:02, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
Above is interesting but it's not related to the thread I started, made the change for the thread above. The Wandering Jew is in the public domain, so should be added, not unusual discovery that there's more depth than current article state/current popular understanding shows. Will try to add this later. 220.127.116.11 (talk) 14:36, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
Scanned the two chapters in question, and didn't see anything but chapters 31 and 32 are in book II and the gutenberg text doesn't have Parts. Scanning for "charcoal" found it's actually in Chapter 3, wherever else, adding to the article.