Talk:Charlotte Rose

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Propose for deletion?[edit]

This person is not notable. Her main activity appears to be self-promotion, perhaps in order to advertise her sexual services. Appearing on UK tv a couple of times is not notable.

In 2014 she took up politics, campaigning for sexual freedom

Ms Rose's campaigning is not detailed in the article or her website - what are her proposed policies?

claimed to be the most expensive escort in South West England, charging £200 an hour

Not notable, and purely a matter of opinion, not backed by any evidence.

Following this appearance Rose claimed she was the victim of a hate campaign, which resulted in her landlord evicting her and having to move to London.

Another doubtful claim. Ms Rose appears to have made this complaint to the media, rather than have made any police or legal complaint.

In an interview with the BBC Rose stated she planned to stand in the 2015 general election in Brighton,[7] later announcing via Twitter she was going to stand in the seat of Brighton Kemptown as an independent.

Charlotte Rose did not in fact stand in the 2015 general election in either Brighton constituency, and most likely didn't stand in any constituency, despite media claims of her intention to do so, I have removed this claim from the article.

For those who have googled Charlotte Rose's websites - [1], [2], please note that this person has no formal awarded or inherited title, i.e. 'Lady' Charlotte, and 'First Lady of sex' are self-awarded 'titles'. --Centrepull (talk) 20:27, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've spent some time yesterday and today updating the article about this rather colourful individual. Self-publicist she may be, but she does seem to be a go to person for the UK media whenever comment is needed on some aspect of her profession. I'd say this passes WP:GNG and WP:BIO. This is Paul (talk) 15:26, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I agree, passes WP:GNG and WP:BIO. Plenty of WP:RS to support this. --John B123 (talk) 18:54, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Charlotte Rose. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:26, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Industry recognition award[edit]

A note to editors: Please do not add details of any industry recognition awards unless they can be supported by reliable sources. This is Paul (talk) 18:40, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]