Talk:Chemical process modeling

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Chemical and Bio Engineering (Rated Start-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemical and Bio Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Chemical and Bio Engineering articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Merging Process simulation into Chemical process modeling[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
Time to close discussion as no consensus. -- P 1 9 9   14:30, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

It seems the Process simulation article is mostly about chemical processes. For some reason, Process Design redirects to Process simulation, even though there is a separate Process design (chemical engineering) article. Does anybody have any thoughts on this matter? H Padleckas (talk) 22:20, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

I made Process Design now redirect to Process design (an article of its own), which makes more sense to me. The aforementioned Merge proposal still holds. H Padleckas (talk) 06:09, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

Looking at the two articles I agree that they should be merged. In my experience the technology is usually referred to as process simulation hence Chemical process modeling is best merged into Process simulation. If anyone felt inclined an article on Dynamic Process Simulation should be developed as it is a area of expertise in its own right. Scottinthebox (talk) 18:48, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

  • These are different articles. Do not merge. Rlsheehan (talk) 17:49, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

The above discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.