 |
Chimpanzee was one of the good article nominees, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There are suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. |
|
|
|
|
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Primates, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Primates on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. |
|
 B |
This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale. |
| Top |
This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. |
|
|
|
|
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. |
|
| B |
This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale. |
| ??? |
This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. |
|
|
|
|
 |
Chimpanzee is included in the Wikipedia CD Selection, see Chimpanzee at Schools Wikipedia. Please maintain high quality standards; if you are an established editor your last version in the article history may be used so please don't leave the article with unresolved issues, and make an extra effort to include free images, because non-free images cannot be used on the DVDs. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== I'm fluffy I'm ugly and also sometimes cute?????
[edit] 80 year old chimp? --Not likely
The recent addition to the article that Cheetah the chimp from the Tarzan films lived to be 80 seems to be entirely bogus--there's no documentation (it conviently "burned up" in a fire) and the reference is just Hollywood gossip. It's like saying humans live to be 140. 63.192.100.101 (talk) 22:30, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
[edit] Where Section on Distribution?
Where is the section discussing distribution?--Halqh حَلَقَة הלכהሐላቃህ (talk) 13:11, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
[edit] Bonobo: there and not there
The article clearly states that it is referring to both Chimpanzee strains including the Bonobo. It also clearly states that hierarchy and behavors are very different. When one reads the social structure and other sections, however, only the common Chimpanzee is mentioned and the Bonobo is absent. Given the extreme differences in the two, perhaps we should discuss both in each section? Significant studies on Bonobo behavior have been done and can be used as citations. This would seem prudent since the article is about 'Pan' and no longer specifically Chimpanzees. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.211.133.129 (talk) 17:09, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] Edit request on 18 February 2012
 |
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
It seems that someone may have hacked this page as it only redirects to this extremely offensive link "http://pump.pp4l.me/proof.php." Please fix this. Thank you.
24.12.72.128 (talk) 07:47, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
