Talk:Chinface

This article was nominated for deletion on 16/3/2006. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

Some chinface artists choose, for example, to use discarded animal eyes for authenticity. See the photograph above, where genuine rabbit eyes are utilised. -- This raises concern regarding individuals being encouraged to do such behaviour and possible animal abuse etc, hence has been removed

Is such concern a genuine Wikipedia guideline for removal, or was that a personally motivated edit? If the former, you're probably better off citing the rule so as to avoid accusations of the latter. Asat 07:14, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Chinface. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:36, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]