Talk:Chromatic dragon

This article was nominated for deletion on 5 December 2019. The result of the discussion was merge.

This page was proposed for deletion by Piotrus (talk · contribs) on 3 December 2019.

This redirect is within the scope of the Dungeons & Dragons WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Dungeons & Dragons-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, or join the discussion, where you can join the project and find out how to help!Dungeons & DragonsWikipedia:WikiProject Dungeons & DragonsTemplate:WikiProject Dungeons & DragonsDungeons & Dragons articles

D&D to-do:

view

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Merge : Various articles
Stubs : Dungeoneer's Survival Guide, Swords & Spells, Variant Dungeons & Dragons games, More...
Update : Rewrite to be out-of-universe: Companions of the Hall, Dark Sun, Elf (Dungeons & Dragons)
Verify : add sources to novels planned for merge to List of Dragonlance novels
Other : Collaboration: Dave Arneson, Drow (Dungeons & Dragons)

Weights?[edit]

Where is this weight information coming from? They are way too high (example: 640 TONS for a Red Dragon). They were added by User:72.93.107.103 without explanation or source. Although I like the quality of the article, something appears way off, and may be original research. Turlo Lomon 12:27, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is form A practical guide to dragons which is not to be taken to seriously.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.201.39.165 (talk • contribs)

I am concerned about how much of this may or may not be a copywrite variation. Can anyone who has "A Practical Guide to Dragons" verify this? In addition, it will require a full rewrite, due to the inuniverse tone it carries. Turlo Lomon 11:39, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

just get the weights out of the monstrous (monster) manual —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chocobomastr (talk • contribs) 18:43, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Added deletion tag[edit]

Look, this Project should be deleted totally. A videogame should only have one or two pages. Wikipedia is NOT a videogame tricks and cheat page. Info about videogames should not be detailed on Wikipedia. Please leave this D tag until an administrator ,apart from Jeske, checks it.--Zzubiri (talk) 16:01, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nobody will speedy-delete it based on what you have stated (see WP:CSD). Further, Dungeons and Dragons is not a video game (it may *have* video games, but it is a tabletop game). -Jéské ^{(Blah v^_^v)} 18:03, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Where's the OR?[edit]

Doesn't seem to make any sense.CSHunt68 (talk) 20:53, 29 April 2008 (UTC)CSHunt68[reply]

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

This discussion regarding this move has made this move seem technical in nature. Closing this discussion in order to post this move on Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests. Steel1943 (talk) 04:36, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Chromatic dragon (Dungeons & Dragons) → Chromatic dragon – This article has been the primary article, and only article, for the topic "Chromatic dragon" for a few years. With that rationale, it should be moved to Chromatic dragon, which is currently a redirect to Chromatic dragon (Dungeons & Dragons), but it should be the other way around. Steel1943 (talk) 09:25, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support – straightforward move. I doubt there will ever be anything to disambiguate against. —Torchiest ^talk_edits 13:49, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support - perfectly reasonable. BOZ (talk) 15:13, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.