Talk:Circuit de Monaco
|WikiProject Formula One||(Rated Start-class, High-importance)|
|WikiProject Motorsport||(Rated Start-class, High-importance)|
I corrected the coordinates of the circuit. The coordinates given are for the start/finish line, taken from Google Earth.--Ciroa 16:59, 18 September 2006 (UTC)--
Hello. I believe the Nelson Piquet quote to be "Driving in Monaco is like riding a bike in your living room". At least, that's the way it's been referred to for ages here in Brazil. Does anyone have the source? Cheers. JimboB 14:03, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
Gear for Ste. Devote
By no means is the Ste. Devote Corner taken in third or fourth gear in a formula one car. listen to the engines after having passed the corner, and you will hear at least five upshift manouvres on their ascent to the casino. Based on the fact that all modern have formula one cars have seven-speed-gearboxes, they pass the Ste. Devote corner either in first or second gear. Do not rely on the 'data' that is given to the press by some teams. they all contain some disinformation. 18.104.22.168 (talk) 01:48, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
- On-screen graphics from yesterday's GP suggest Ste. Devote is taken in second.Mr Larrington (talk) 13:01, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
Now I've changed the record lap time back to what it was when M. Schumacher had done a 1:14 lap time. That's all fantastic and that but what I'm wondering is why is the record lap times that's performed in race conditions the only ones that count? Mark Webber did do a faster lap time but it isn't the record. If you can direct me to a discussion that bought about this decision then I would be much appreciated. If this is an unspoken rule, it seems a bit weird to me. Antimatter31 (talk) 08:10, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
- There is no start/finish line at Monaco. The start line is much closer, a couple hundred metres closer, to Ste Devote than the finish line. This is in order to accomodate a full grid on such a short straight as the straight in front of the Monaco pits. But you are right in that the article should say this somewhere. --Falcadore (talk) 22:32, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
This new scheme in it the hairpin name is correctly specified: Fairmont Hotel hairpin instead of Grand hotel hairpin — Preceding unsigned comment added by 22.214.171.124 (talk) 18:08, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
The article currently states:
The Rascasse takes the cars into a short, adversely-cambered straight that precedes the final corner, Virage Antony Noghes.
Could it be that the intention here was to convey that the (normal) camber is unfavourable to the drivers, since they tend to use the outside of the track at this point (due to shortness of the straight and the preceding and following bends both being right-hand)?
Having driven around the track there, itis inversely cambered (higher at the centre of the track than the edges). Inverse is objective, adverse is subjective. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 126.96.36.199 (talk) 09:48, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
That's also how I remember it, from walking the course, and also from TV coverage (2012-05-26) where the (straight) bridge cast a visibly "humped" shadow. In the absence of any support for it being adversely-cambered, I'm going to remove that claim. 188.8.131.52 (talk) 12:52, 27 May 2012 (UTC)