Talk:Citation Style Language

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Libraries Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Libraries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Libraries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LibrariesWikipedia:WikiProject LibrariesTemplate:WikiProject LibrariesLibraries articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Move?[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Move. Jafeluv (talk) 08:42, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Citation style language → Citation Style Language —

Proper name. Pnm (talk) 00:38, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
There is risk of confusion here. "Citation Style Language" is this specific computer language; "citation style language" looks like any formal language usage used in making literary citations. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 06:39, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support: Clearly a proper noun, should be capitalized as such. –CWenger (talk) 15:53, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support: The move is necessary to reduce confusion with a certain style of language, and proper because Citation Style Language is a proper language. Quigley (talk) 08:48, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

CSL file for mediawiki cite?[edit]

It would be useful to have a csl file to format citations for wikipedia's citation templates. Is it possible?Niels Olson (talk) 01:04, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Citation Style Language. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080619025102/http://www.silmaril.ie/bibliox/biblioxdoc.html to http://www.silmaril.ie/bibliox/biblioxdoc.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:07, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]