Talk:Community Rights Counsel

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Structure[edit]

This is my first completely new page, created mostly because I wanted more information after reading the section on this group in Gonzales v. Raich. Please let me know and/or fix any problems in the formatting of this page.

Speedy deletion[edit]

The nominator is annoyed at me for tagging an article of his for speedy deletion (for copyright violation). Unlike him, I actually took the time to describe the organization in my own words. Patently ridiculous, vengeful speedy nom. —ShadowRanger ^(talk|stalk) 22:45, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Technically, I suppose one phrase within the article's lede is drawn directly from the about page "communities in protecting their health and welfare", but I'm fairly sure it's not copyvio at that level of borrowing. —ShadowRanger ^(talk|stalk) 22:50, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Broken about link[edit]

The link in the note:

"About CRC". Retrieved 2009-06-10.

http://www.communityrights.org/AboutCRC/about.asp is broken.

The about link is now: http://communityrights.org/AboutCRC/about.php It is brief and uses past tense...

I did not edit it since I was unsure how to fix broken note links. Just edit url? Fholson 11:57, 3 May 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fholson (talk • contribs)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Community Rights Council. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090330000912/http://www.communityrights.org/Newsroom/crcInTheNews/WP11-29-04.asp to http://www.communityrights.org/Newsroom/crcInTheNews/WP11-29-04.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:05, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]