This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
Fscavo (talk·contribs) This user has contributed to the article. This user has declared a connection.
I am a COI editor, but just making a note that it was the second deletion nomination that resulted in "no consensus." Fscavo (talk) 22:51, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Since the prior nomination for deletion of this article resulted in no consensus and the article remains, now might be a good time to revise it to bring it up to date and to provide a bit more information. Some of the information in the article is out of date. Because I am a COI editor, I should not make any changes to the article. Therefore, I am hoping that another editor or two can step in and make a few changes/improvements. There are two good sources for more current and historical information on Computer Economics.
Hoping that following non-COI editors will be willing to take a look and help with the above: Cunard (talk), doncram (talk), hobit (talk).
Thanks in advance Fscavo (talk) 23:03, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Fscavo The status was changed to decline, because there's not a draft of sourced content. You can draft the content, which can be reviewed under a new {{request edit}}, if you wish.--CaroleHenson(talk) 10:21, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
CaroleHenson Thank you. I will draft the content as you indicated Fscavo (talk) 13:41, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]