Qualitative use of the word "dubious" is dubious almost any time, but is very clearly so here. Hardly factual or encyclopedic. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Egospoon (talk • contribs) 03:21, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
Removed the ‘dubious content’ and updated the page. --Foresterr (talk) 06:31, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
I substantially edited this article. Most of the text is now mine. Please see my User page for my qualifications. I would appreciate any help, discussion, etc. as I continue to expand and edit this article. Thanks. ARRust —Preceding unsigned comment added by ARRust (talk • contribs) 20:08, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: No move.Cúchullaint/c 13:48, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
Comment. Is there some other "conceptual proliferation" that we're disambiguating from? Otherwise I would oppose this move as unnecessary disambiguation. Jenks24 (talk) 07:32, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.