This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
It's asking you to discuss the word origin. Not give your opinion on where you think it should go. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.127.116.11 (talk) 20:35, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
I personally feel that the orgin of Consortium should not be in the opening sentence. Does anyone else think it would make more sense to put it at the end of the initial paragraphs? To me, the first sentence should tell you precisely what a consortium is, not where it came from. Gantry 15:35, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
I miss some terminology/vocabulary things... Like, what are called the consortium participants. What is called when you're choosed to win the prize? Etc. It helps when a non-native speaker is trying to write about this and doesn't know all terms. Normal general-purpose dictionaries rarely are useful for this purpose. Thanks. • Ekevu • ♥ • ★ 14:04, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
It should specify the relation between the consortium members and their liability from the the taxation and others point of view. It should also specify whether its mandatory to form a SPV or JV for the Consortioum. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 18.104.22.168 (talk) 11:18, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
There are no real meaning of consortia.it is very dofficult for the user.they can not get relevant information regarding it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 22.214.171.124 (talk) 04:06, 7 June 2010 (UTC)