Talk:Constitution Project

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Organizations (Rated Start-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Organizations. If you would like to participate please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject United States (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Merger proposal[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result of this discussion was to merge the articles. Yachtsman1 (talk) 19:21, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

I propose that The Constitution Project's Guantanamo Task Force be merged into The Constitution Project. I think that the content in the The Constitution Project's Guantanamo Task Force article can easily be explained in the context of The Constitution Project, and the The Constitution Project article is of a reasonable size in which the merging of The Constitution Project's Guantanamo Task Force will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. Yachtsman1 (talk) 22:05, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

  • Support merger per Yachtsman. A sensible move.--JayJasper (talk) 22:11, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Support, there isn't enough to say about the Task Force beyond what's already there, so a merger is the sensible thing. If the Task Force would become a lot more notable and more independent info on it is available, a split can always be done again. Fram (talk) 07:30, 25 February 2011 (UTC)


No Secondary Sources//Lots of Editing By Organizations Press Sec[edit]

This article needs secondary, RS. It has also been largely edited by staff. Capitalismojo (talk) 02:32, 27 April 2013 (UTC)