Talk:Conversation threading

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Websites / Computing  (Rated C-class)
WikiProject icon This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.
 
WikiProject Google (Rated C-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Google, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Google and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

This needs examples of what threading looks like and a better plain English definition.


I originally edited the topic thread page, but have now moved my edits here, as they are a more general discussion of threading.

The first paragraph is a poor definition, in my opinion, since it does not concentrate specifically on what differentiates threaded discussion from other forms of discussion on the net.James Harvey 11:06, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Photo[edit]

I added a photo, but phpBB is a poor example of threading. Anyone have a better one? ffm 22:39, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Should get a shot of KAWF. It's a very good example of threading.Big-Pat Talk 07:51, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Threads[edit]

Is this article about usenet threads (tree), or all threads - forum threads (phpbb, linear) too? 83.68.80.123 (talk) 03:48, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

The lede (first paragraph) says all threads, e.g., for online discussions. That may be overly broad. Tedickey (talk) 14:20, 14 November 2009 (UTC)


phpBB discussion example is weak.[edit]

show something with fully threading, a reply with a quote is ridiculous. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.69.80.208 (talk) 08:06, 5 March 2010 (UTC)