Talk:Core sample

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Geology (Rated Start-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon Core sample is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Material merged from coring talk page[edit]

Merge proposal[edit]

I think Coring and Core sample would go quite well together. Does anyone have any reason the two shouldn't be merged? TastyCakes (talk) 23:22, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Agree ResMar 15:53, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
The Coring page within Wikipedia has nothing to do with sampling. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.153.229.143 (talk) 16:13, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
Yes, the articles were merged and the coring article no longer mentions this type of coring, like it used to. TastyCakes (talk) 17:18, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Multiple Issues[edit]

Since I'm sitting on a mobile offshore drilling rig, reading the proposal for coring on the next well, I suppose I'd better go through this article and address multiple issues I see on first read-through. The notes below are as much for my own guidance while modifying the article.

  • The materials used in construction of core-cutting equipment are largely irrelevant.
  • Methods - at least one numerically frequent type of core is note addressed - "percussion cores", known in the oil industry by various brand names and acronyms such as "SWC".
  • The "management" section (perfectly reasonable in itself - that's why we have a core programme before we even get the rig to the location!) contains "techniques" information that would probably be best broken out into a separate section.
  • Layering and stratigraphy is often irrelevant to cores cut for mineral projects. (I see a break-out there into dendrochronology, which is perceptive.)

I'll make some alterations in respect of these issues and see what other people have to say.

Comments on my own changes[edit]

  • Added several different techniques, with discussion of their suitability for different circumstances and limitations on target materials.
  • Excised the "methods" material from the "management" section ; that looks like a cut'n'paste from somewhere else anyway. Discussed the data necessary to relate the core sample to the (geological) structure that it samples. The importance of record keeping.
  • The "historical" matter in the "management" section is ... well, it's now a separate section.
  • Processing techniques ... I've writen something, but the network engineer has just come into the office to do "stuff". So that's me finished.

Aidan Karley (talk) 14:06, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

The history of core sampling in this article gives no dates and does not tell who did the first core sampling. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.149.207.218 (talk) 12:11, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

""Granitic" rock core from stillwater igneous complex, Montana (from a spoil pile)" captioned picture in "Methods" Section[edit]

Please review this caption for correctness.

The core in the picture does not appear to be granitic. Is it a gneiss?

To me, it looks more like a gabbro or a norite.

What do you think?

Thank you for your time,

08Geologist80 21:54, 14 October 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 08Geologist80 (talkcontribs)