Talk:Counterintelligence

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
          This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject Espionage (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon Counterintelligence is within the scope of WikiProject Espionage, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Espionage and Espionage-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, or contribute to the discussion.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
 
WikiProject Espionage (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon Counterintelligence is within the scope of WikiProject Espionage, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Espionage and Espionage-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, or contribute to the discussion.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
 
WikiProject Military history (Rated C-Class)
MILHIST This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
C This article has been rated as C-Class on the quality assessment scale.

Archived discussion[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was don't move. —Nightstallion (?) Seen this already? 07:47, 28 April 2006 (UTC) Counterintelligence vs. Counter-intelligence? The community uses the former.

—Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.171.210.45 (talkcontribs) 02:40, 28 May 2005

why is "mole hunt" not an artical or a redirrect to this artical, and can someone take care of that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.15.127.225 (talk) 04:20, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Requested move[edit]

Counter-intelligence → Counterintelligence – more common usage (even in this article) Akrabbim 20:13, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

[copied from WP:RM by James F. (talk) 20:38, 23 April 2006 (UTC)]

Survey[edit]

Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
  • Oppose; this looks like an AE/BE issue, here. James F. (talk) 20:39, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

Discussion[edit]

Add any additional comments

If it's really a matter of AE/BE differences or similar (which I'm guessing is the case), then so long as there's a redirect from the other name, it doesn't matter which name is used. Andrewa 00:20, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

AFAIK it is. —Nightstallion (?) Seen this already? 07:47, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Military c-e[edit]

In many countries army has its own c-e, see Główny Zarząd Informacji Wojska Polskiego in Communist Poland. Xx236 15:25, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

Spelling!![edit]

Counterintelligence is ONE word... Not hyphenated.

Spelling X2[edit]

Counterintelligence is ONE word... Not hyphenated. I would agree.

Counterintelligence[edit]

Counterintelligence is the accepted spelling for the United States' military and civilian programs. References include the National Counterintelligence Executive (NCIX), the now disestablished Counterintelligence Field Activity (CIFA), and INSCOM. Netherper (talk) 10:22, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

Counterintelligence is a very important word, when you are planning to take action against any hostile enemies. For an example, during the vietnam war. There was a large movement of China Red Army, estimation unknown, destination unknown. Because of the forest covering the Loas, and other parts of that area. The China Red Army vanished the satelite. We didn't know where they were. So, the U.S. Army in Vietnam were notified by the Washington to search for a heavy resistence or heavy concentration of the resistence inside of Loas. U.S. Army iniated a search and destory mission within the Target Area. U.S. Army counterintelligence did reported that there was a very concentration of resistence somewhere in Loas. U.S. Air force initiated carpet bombing using 50 B-52's High Attitude Jet Bombers for 5 days. After the bombing, on April 26, 1972-everything was quiet at the western front. We won Vietnam on that date, we were not to win the war based upon the population control for Vietnam. Frankly, We Won, We Lost the War, Just to Answer the Population Control. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jesuitmilitarychaplain (talkcontribs) 23:35, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Dividing out the sections[edit]

Recommend moving Offensive Counterintelligence to OFCO and creating a separate entry. The same with counterespionage (CE) and other activities such as CFSO and formerly LLSO and MSO.