Talk:Craig Cardiff

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Craig Cardiff. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:07, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Critique of article[edit]

I have some concerns about this article. Overall, it seems to be providing a rather one-sided view of Craig Cardiff and provides a lot of opinions and not a lot of facts. I think this affects the neutrality of this article. Additionally, there is an extensive number of quotations in this article that I believe should be paraphrased and/or amalgamated into paragraphs. Are all of these quotations truly necessary? Finally, many of the sources cited appear to be from small journals, and their reliability may be called into question. Are their more reliable sources we could draw from? Lisakuil (talk) 23:35, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I agree there were too many quotes from the subject. That is great for a biographical book, but this is an encyclopedia article. If too many quotes from subject, we may only get subject's view, which is not WP:NPOV. I have paraphrased some of the quotes.OnBeyondZebraxTALK 21:06, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]