This article is within the scope of WikiProject Curling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of curling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sports, a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of sport-related topics on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that are spoken on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
The article says "In the Winter Olympics, a team may concede after finishing any end during a round-robin game," but after the 7-point end in the UK vs US 2014 round-robin women's game commentator Pete Fenson said a team couldn't concede until after the 6th end during the round robin. Pete's a bronze medal winner; did he misspeak, or is the article wrong? Jere7my (talk) 06:42, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
It's possible the rule has changed, as this is an instance of a rule that changes frequently. -- Earl Andrew - talk 07:48, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
There is usually a minimum number of ends that needs to be played in these top-level competitions, which I think is usually six ends. I remember it was like this for one of the Briers where a team was outscored greatly and had to pay a fine for conceding earlier than the sixth end. Prayerfortheworld (talk) 07:58, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
I don't understand the need to single out when the sport started in the US. they are not very relevant to the sport. I propose to remove the paragraph regarding the Detroit curling club. 220.127.116.11 (talk) 09:02, 17 February 2014 (UTC) mikitukka
Agree that this para should go but not because it is US-centric but because there is no reference cited and a bit of research following the links in it would indicate that the key points are not actually true. Exnihil(talk) 12:59, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
I also agree that the US info is inappropriate as they are not a world curling power, and had considered changing it myself. One could make an argument to exchange US info for Canadian info, which would be very relevant - but in the interests of neutrality, perhaps replacement with info on the sport's arrival in North America would be best.Ian mckenzie (talk) 00:31, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Removed; no apparent interest expressed in retaining it. If replaced please ensure that it is i). True ii). Significant iii). Matches related pages iv). Has adequate citations. Exnihil(talk) 05:56, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
This section could be expanded to include the very important movement from outdoor to indoor ice, from natural to artificial ice, and the origins of pebbling. Ian mckenzie (talk) 23:59, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
Under "curling culture/amateur sport" the article states that: "because accuracy, strategy, skill, and experience are more valuable in curling than traditional sports virtues of speed, stamina, and strength, most competitive curlers are older than their counterparts in other sports." Like a number of sections in the article, this statement lacks citations, and would also seem to be demonstrably false. From what I've seen, the world's top curlers are getting increasingly younger. Also, what "traditional" sports are being used as a benchmark for age? Some of the top skiers are in the 30s, and a few are still competing in their 40s. 18.104.22.168 (talk) 22:05, 20 February 2015 (UTC)