Talk:Vincetoxicum nigrum

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Cynanchum louiseae)

Public domain information[edit]

This articles utilizes information from nps.gov, which as a US governmental organization releases its content into the public domain. Rkitko (talk) 12:31, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

C. louiseae versus V. nigrum[edit]

There is clearly a nomenclatural issue going on between the synonyms Vincetoxicum nigrum and Cynanchum louiseae. At the article for the genus [Vincetoxicum], we say that some of it's species have been included in Cynanchum; the implication is that the classification in Vincetoxicum is more recent and more authoritative. And yet, this article is still named "Cynanchum louiseae", and "Vincetoxicum nigrum" forwards to it, rather than the other way around, and the article uses the former nomenclature throughout. What is the actual nomenclatural history? Does the article need to be fixed (and other articles that point to it)? Certainly we should put in a paragraph explaining the nomenclature issue. ACW (talk) 19:04, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Cynanchum louiseae. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:58, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]