This article was nominated for deletion on 1 February 2010. The result of the discussion was Notable but deleted due to BLP sourcing concerns.
This article was nominated for deletion on 6 February 2010. The result of the discussion was SNOW keep.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music articles
The article is not in need of expansion, all the main points are covered and there is not really a need of an expert as me and the other editor had a good understanding, so we really do not need the templates? Off2riorob (talk) 01:28, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
None of the current sources are reliable. As the only reason Scott restored it was because of the promise that it would be reliably sourced. I looked, and could find no reliable sources that provided non-trivial coverage of this guy. Therefore, I've put it back up for deletion. UnitAnode 01:32, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
