Talk:Dance Again... the Hits/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: WikiRedactor (talk · contribs) 20:59, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Toolserver identified some links that need to be replaced.
  • Introduction looks good.
     Done, I see the links have been corrected.
  • In "Commercial performace", pick one styling of peaks (ie. number three or number 3), but not both.
  • Numbers lower than ten should be spelled out, while numbers higher than that should be written in numeric form.  — Statυs (talk, contribs) 21:52, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Ref #4 (JenniferLopez.com; "Hooked on You") links to an error page.
  • It works for me. It doesn't have a stylesheet, but the page itself shows the content.  — Statυs (talk, contribs) 21:40, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Ref #10 (Billboard) needs to list Prometheus Global Media as the publisher.
  • Ref #11 (Digital Spy) needs to list Hearst Corporation as the publisher.
  • Ref #14 (Idolator) needs to list Buzz Media as the publisher.
  • Ref #22 (rapfix.mtv.com) should to rewrite the work as MTV News Rapfix, as that is how the website names it.
  • Ref #25 (Allmusic) needs to list Rovi Corporation as the publisher.
  • Ref #30 (USA Today) needs the work as USA Today and the publisher as Gannett Company.
  • Ref #36 (FIMI) links to an error page.
  • The site seems to have had a URL change, and I can't find it's new link.  — Statυs (talk, contribs) 21:52, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    • I noticed that as soon as I checked out the page afterwards, it seems to be a mess. I found a replacement link from Ultratop instead. :-) WikiRedactor (talk) 19:47, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Ref #64 (Billboard) needs to list Prometheus Global Media.

Other than these minor tweaks, the article looks pretty solid to me. I'll put it on hold for a week. WikiRedactor (talk) 19:10, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Good work, everything looks good so I'll pass the article! WikiRedactor (talk) 19:47, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.