Talk:Daniel Kolak

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
          This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject Biography / Science and Academia (Rated Start-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the science and academia work group.
 
WikiProject Philosophy (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Croatia (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon Daniel Kolak is within the scope of WikiProject Croatia, a collaborative effort to improve the quality and coverage of articles related to Croatia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 


mess[edit]

wow, this page is a mess! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.103.179.205 (talk) 00:11, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

You're right, this article needs a lot of work. But the information is all there, it's just needs to be re-arranged and copyedited to comply with Wikipedia standards and guidelines. My regards, Laurinavicius (talk) 23:51, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
It sounds too laudatory. I'm sure this man has done many wonderful things, but can we restrict it just to the stuff for which he is really notable? I take it that he is primarily notable as a philosopher, and not so notable as a theatre director or musician or campaigner or so on, so the focus should be on his philosophy, and the other stuff should be severely pared back. 60.225.114.230 (talk) 10:34, 9 March 2012 (UTC)