Talk:Dankmar Adler

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Architect?[edit]

Dankmar Adler shouldn't be listed under Architects - he was an engineer and his partner, Louis Sullivan, was the architect. Adler's wonderful steel frames opened up the buildings and allowed Sullivan and others to creat the 'Chicago" style with its strong horizontal lines and extrodinary details.

If being the senior partner of the best architecture firm in the country does not make you an architect, what does?

Sullivan starved without him.

Article which sdresses the work of the Firm?[edit]

Shouldn't there be an article about Adler & Sullivan that addresses the work of the firm; and then separate biographical articles about Louis Sullivan and Dankmar Adler, each of which provides a complete biography along with information about their individual work when they were not partners. I believe Adler was a member of a Chicago firm called "Burling & Adler" earlier in his career. The Sullivan article credits all the work of the firm Adler & Sullivan firm to Sullivan, yet Adler, Wright, Elmslie and others played significant roles and at times were certainly equal contributors. SeattleArch 16:56, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dankmar Adler. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:44, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]