Talk:David C. Geary

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Biography / Science and Academia (Rated Stub-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the science and academia work group.
 
WikiProject Psychology  
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 

Untitled[edit]

  • What were the specific reasons as to why this article was tagged for cleanup?
Third party references are needed & a short list of publications in list format helps. Obviously N academic psychologist but needs highlighting for people here to realize.03:48, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
  • I'll add some papers and other info soon. EPM 12:30, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

This guy seems to be a professor with typical professorial publications and typical professorial achievements, why does he merit a wikipedia page? If he perfects fusion or gets a nobel prize, then maybe we can talk, but this guy is just a college professor. —Preceding unsigned comment added by DavesPlanet (talkcontribs) 00:47, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

I agree to DavesPlanet. This page seems more like a personal homepage of a "college professor". I don't see a hint why he should merit a Wikipedia article. He got some publications, but without major impact, as far as I can see. For me, it's a delete candidate. 80.219.28.219 (talk) 08:51, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

"This Guy"[edit]

"This Guy" is hardly a typical professor. If you read his achievements, publications, and current affiliations (Presidents National Mathematics Panel, for example,) it would be easy for anyone to understand why he has a wikipedia page. Google him. 259,000 hits. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Penel0pe5150 (talkcontribs) 03:40, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

He is one of the founders of a whole field that seeks to bring together Anthropology and Psychology. He is kind of important. Curttalkthai (talk) 18:40, 18 October 2009 (UTC)