Talk:David Hahn (American politician)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

AfD[edit]

I intend to expand this article just as soon as I have time, and I don't think it should be considered for deletion. The gubernatorial election in Nebraska this year is of interest to many readers and David Hahn is a serious and visible candidate. He is running against an incumbant governor who has not been elected to his current position. This race is one of the main contested races in Nebraska this year and both David Hahn and Dave Heineman's entries deserve to be expanded. By the way, this is not reposted content. Although I obtained the image from the candidate's press kit on his web page, I compiled all this information from newspaper articles. Pete Ricketts is in a similar situation vis-a-vis his particular race, but it doesn't seem that anyone is calling for that page to be deleted. I can understand deleting the page if it was written by someone with ties to Hahn's campaign as it seems the last incarnation was, but I have absolutely no relationship with anyone connected with this race. Believe it or not, some people are interested in reading about politicians especially when they're in the news, in ads, etc. Please hold off on deleting the article. Alienmercy 08:00, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

alienmercy is right plus this is not repost and only three people particpate in the last discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Hahn (Nebraska) csd g4 does not apply Yuckfoo 08:30, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

24%[edit]

We kept this article around for that? Fan-1967 15:53, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:David-Hahn-Nebraska.jpg[edit]

Image:David-Hahn-Nebraska.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:41, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Omar Ahmad (American politician) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 22:32, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on David Hahn (American politician). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:28, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]