This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard. If you are connected to one of the subjects of this article and need help, please see this page.
David Silverman (activist) is part of WikiProject Atheism, which aims to organize, expand, clean up and guide Wikipedia articles relating to atheism. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article and visit the project page.
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The common name for this individual is David Silverman, as opposed to Dave. The Simpsons director shares the same name, yet there is no disambiguation that leads to this. Because this is not the common name, the page should be moved. Blizzardman1219 (talk) 08:23, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
Oppose. All nine mentions of him in the article itself say "Dave", not "David". If it is deemed necessary to rename it David for some as-yet undisclosed reason, move this article to David Silverman (atheist) or something similiar. Softlavender (talk) 07:46, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
Comment: Where is the evidence that David Silverman is the common name used for this individual? Here is what I found:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Dave Silverman.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
how can a rageface be copyrighted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 18.104.22.168 (talk) 04:54, 9 September 2011 (UTC) I guarantee i could find the person that created that vector image (whatever you nerds call it) and get his permission... but seeing as it isn't copyrighted in the first place this seems GIVE IT BACK15:43, 9 September 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 22.214.171.124 (talk)