Talk:Deadblow

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
          This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject Robotics (Rated Stub-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon Deadblow is within the scope of WikiProject Robotics, which aims to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Robotics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page (Talk), where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
Note icon
This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.
WikiProject Sports  
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sports, a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of sport-related topics on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Television  
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of television on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deadblow[edit]

The result of the debate was keep.  (aeropagitica)  (talk)  12:04, 2 July 2006 (UTC)


I do not believe that deletion is the proper course of action for this article. I would suggest a compilation article containing the information of various robots used in the related competitions as they are notable as a whole if not notable individually. 216.150.253.8 (talk) 00:24, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Attention needed[edit]

  • Expansion
  • Refs

Chaosdruid (talk) 18:28, 1 August 2010 (UTC)