Talk:Delivery point

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Philately  
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of the Philately WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of philately and stamp collecting. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks or check out the Philately Portal.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 

DP vs. DPB[edit]

You say "delivery point (also abbreviated DPB)". Say where the B comes from. --jidanni

It stands for Delivery Point Barcode. Since these digit generally do not appear in human-readable form in the address, they are almost exclusively associated with the POSTNET barcode in the US. Froese 18:51, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

In regards to the USPS, it is commonly abbreviated as DPBC. I don't believe I have seen it abbreviated to just DPB. Kenrus 21:45, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

Delivery points[edit]

Does every address in the country have a zip+4?Audejoos 22:33, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Yes, definitely, every postal address in the United States (and trust territories served by the USPS) has a Zip+4. In fact, every address has a unique delivery point barcode (Zip+4+delivery point.) However, when coding a mailing list, there is often 3%-5% of records that can't be match—usually because of non-standard addresses. Froese 03:05, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Say, Froese, can you point me somewhere to verify that? I suspected that to be the case, but it's really important for a project I'm working on to be sure that each DP is unique (beyond the uncodable ones of course :D). Thanks! True Vox (talk) 17:09, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Delivery point can be as term in trade contract. It's mean that seller should to delivered the goods to buyer on a place. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.35.63.69 (talk) 02:26, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Neat![edit]

Neat article, very interesting. Thanks to those who worked on it! Lhimec (talk) 18:23, 14 January 2014 (UTC)