|This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Dell article.|
|Archives: 1, 2, 3|
|Dell was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There are suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.|
|This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:|
|A news item involving Dell was featured on Wikipedia's main page in the In the news section on 7 February 2013.|
- 1 "Buys"
- 2 Lead-sentence structure (continued)
- 3 Dead links in this article
- 4 Unsourced Material
- 5 Corporatespeak
- 6 File:Delllogo.png Nominated for speedy Deletion
- 7 File:PCs Limited.PNG Nominated for speedy Deletion
- 8 Enron
- 9 Dell Summit
- 10 Logo Inaccuracy
- 11 Removing non-discussed links
- 12 LBO
- 13 Public or Private?
- 14 Fiscal Year vs Calendar Year
- 15 There is no retail shop in Moscow
A user named Sandtrap555 has been trying to assert that he is an employee for dell and cited a non-relevant source to say that dell buys computers as a major business operation. I urge a moderator to please revert this edit back to the original version as it appears to be vandalism. --Historyboy226 (talk) 22:27, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
Lead-sentence structure (continued)
A Wikipedian has suggested that a proposed re-casting of the lede along the lines of "The multi-national information-technology corporation Dell Inc develops, sells and supports computers and related products" seems just as accurate as some other version. We can agree on that. But what of precision and style? -- Pedant17 (talk) 02:56, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
- It's no more or less precise than the current lead sentence, and it's slightly worse style per WP:BOLDTITLE ("the article's subject is stated as early as possible in the first sentence"). I think we're fine with the current wording. --McGeddon (talk) 08:19, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
As a former Ottawa resident I was heartened to see so much Canadian content in this article. However, it appears that a lot of those Canadian links are dead. For example: in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dell#Further_reading see the Ottawa Business Journal link under Dell Ottawa references:. Ottawahitech (talk) 15:02, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
article from december 1987 refers to Dell as Dell The name probably changed before 1988 then?
http://books.google.com/books?id=Aj8EAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA44&lpg=PA44&dq=dell+%22honeywell+bull%22+1987..1989+repair&source=bl&ots=0LCmK-JcBS&sig=_OgMxGH7PViMWg7RiRAiPuYtww0&hl=en&ei=tefYTPvoFMKdnAeG9MmJCg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CBcQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=honeywell&f=false —Preceding unsigned comment added by 22.214.171.124 (talk) 06:22, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
The below material has been moved from the article after not being sourced long-term. Please feel free to reincorporate into the article with appropriate sourcing! Doniago (talk) 19:01, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
Education K12 Market
===Education K12 Market===
There have been many different definitions to the "Intelligent Classroom" over the last 10 years. Some of the definitions are as vague as putting an interactive white board and a projector in the room. Others are more detailed and include specific content.
Dell Corporation has been a leader for years and has had several different versions of the “Intelligent Classroom”. The most current definition is: “through its ability to stimulate learning on multiple levels, technology can enhance the classroom experience for both teachers and student”.
Other corporations and products have included other definitions. One of these includes: “The most important part of the Intelligent Classroom is the ...Students, Teacher, and the Educational Interaction”. This view stresses the importance of the educational interaction rather than just products.
Typical technology used in an Intelligent Classroom would include a projector, computer, sound, student response systems, video distribution, and IP TV. All of these products would have one goal, and that is to improve the learning experience for the students. If implemented correctly, Media Rich Curriculum (MRC) is now the center piece of the classroom rather than the technology.Video Distribution on a local area network requires these key features: A properly designed network and video distribution equipment. A general guideline can be followed if questions are brought up regarding the ability of a specific network to support video distribution: "If the network can support VoiP (Voice Over IP) the network should support video distribution." While this is a general statement, it does help educators set a guideline for implementing MRC on a network going to a classroom.
In the previous version, the second paragraph contained the sentence "Dell has grown by both organic and inorganic means since its inception", with links to definitions of "organic growth" and "inorganic growth". This was is a ridiculous example of corporatespeak and very user-unfriendly. Replaced with "Dell has grown by both increasing its customer base and through acquisitions since its inception." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Just Below 39 (talk • contribs) 13:29, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
File:Delllogo.png Nominated for speedy Deletion
|An image used in this article, File:Delllogo.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
File:PCs Limited.PNG Nominated for speedy Deletion
An image used in this article, File:PCs Limited.PNG, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 17 November 2011
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Gender Studies#Dell Summit. --John Vandenberg (chat) 05:03, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
The logo at the top of the article is incorrect. It is currently an amalgamation of the old dell script, with an added blue circle. The new logo has a slightly different script - the 'E' is slightly taller, and the shape has been changed.
See this article for more info: http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/logo-design-brand-dell-logo-dude,news-34674.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lukes123 (talk • contribs) 21:02, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi, In the main-article I see under the section External links this comment: !-- ATTENTION! Please do not add links without discussion and consensus on the talk page. Undiscussed links will be removed. --
Since when do we need to meet consensus on (parts of) an article before placing it and why would you want this. (I can understand such a step if an edit-war has been going on at some time where external links were added/removed all the time: but I can't find any proof of that).
If external link (or any other part of the article) is relevant and meets all the normal guidelines for inclusion in the article I don't see why it would need to be discussed first. And if the external link has no additional value or doesn't meet the normal requirements it can be removed... Only when someone would like to include an external link and isn't sure if it is appropiate he/she could then choose to discuss it first on the Talk page and if then the consensus is that the link should be placed, place it. And the other way around: if an earlier removed link (and again: or any other part of the article) has already been discussed on the Talk page and the general consensus was to remove it - then it makes sense to discuss it prior to re-placing the link again, and so long no new concensus has been reached about that link you can delete it while referring to the earlier discussion on the Talk page where consensus was made to remove it.
As far as I know this is against the principle of Wikipedia that you require consensus on information to add. If there are special circumstances (earlier vandalism, advertising-attempts etc) to require such a step there are ways to prevent it (for example: make an article protected or semi-protected) and unless there special circumstances to do this I don't think it is appropiate to keep this comment in the article.
- It looks like that may have been added for the first time with this edit. I would recommend contacting the contributing editor if you have not already done so. Doniago (talk) 13:36, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
- @Doniago : I did contact Kkm010 via his TALK page and because I didn't see any editwar or anything prior to that.... But thanks for your reaction, Tonkie (talk) 18:58, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Cited from press release. So Silver Lake owns my ass again (ex-SunGard). Not changed private / public status as I don't follow the Street closely enough to know when the shares are formally de-listed (or whether they will continue to list even in private hands, as some apparently do). Guy (Help!) 15:01, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
Public or Private?
Fiscal Year vs Calendar Year
I saw some edits and reverts in April 2013 and in the comments with the edits some refs were made to the fiscal year (FY) and calendar year (CY). Dell is currently (12 April, 2013) in FY 2014: the FY of Dell runs from 1st February to 31 January and is in 11 months of the year thus one year AHEAD of the calendar year. So FY 2015 will start on 1 Feb 2014 - unless the company would decide to change their financial reporting when they move away from the stock-market and go back private (anyway: when the company leaves the public market they will publish a lot less financial figures). Cheers, Tonkie (talk) 20:32, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
There is no retail shop in Moscow
I, literally, live in Moscow, there is no, and for at least 3-4 years never was any Dell retail shop. Where this information coming from? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 126.96.36.199 (talk) 06:46, 21 December 2013 (UTC)