Talk:Dependencies of Norway

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Norway (Rated Stub-class)
WikiProject icon This article is part of WikiProject Norway, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to Norway. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 
WikiProject Antarctica / Norwegian Antarctica (Rated Stub-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Antarctica, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Antarctica on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by Norwegian Antarctica work group.
 

Yes MERGE. Inge 18:01, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

My "yes merge" comment above was intended for the merger of Dronning Maud Land and Queen Maude Land.Inge 20:32, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Better still: merge also the (sub-)antarctic uninhabited Norwegian islands into the same article (it has already been moved to a common name: Norwegian Antarctic Territory) Fastifex 23:24, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

Borders[edit]

I believe I learned that the Norwegian Antarctic territory is the only claim that doesn't extend to 90S and doesn't have a definite northern limit (whereas the rest of them specifically run from 60S to 90S. Can this be a) confirmed and b) added (if confirmed)? --Canuckguy 22:03, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

I've learned the same, but found no documentation to back me up, so I haven't changed the errors in various articles. The map at Image:Antarctica.jpg does appear to support that QML is not a sector. Jørgen 18:24, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
And, by the way, I think the reason for this is that Norway promotes the mid-line principle rather than the sector principle in the border conflict with Russia in the Arctic Ocean, and doesn't want the Antarctic claim to be inconsistent with this. Jørgen 18:26, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

official name[edit]

Is this "Norwegian Antarctic Territory" the official name used by the Norway government for the three territories (Bouvet, Peter I, Queen Maud Land)? In either case it should be clearly noted if this is official designation or just grouping by someone (who? source?). Alinor (talk) 16:24, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Name[edit]

I see an editor moved the article's name from "Norwegian Antarctic Territory" to "Norwegian Antarctic territories". While better, it does nonetheless not cover the fact that Bouvet Island is not in the Antarctic, but rather in the Subantarctic. A correct title for this article would then be either Norwegian Antarctic and Subantarctic territories, or Dependencies of Norway, given that the three territories in question are the only dependent territories of Norway. Arsenikk (talk) 10:17, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Dependencies of Norway sound good. Rettetast (talk) 21:35, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

overlap with List of possessions of Norway[edit]

See Talk:Administrative divisions of Norway and Talk:List_of_possessions_of_Norway#overlap_with_Dependencies_of_Norway. Alinor (talk) 07:43, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

The issue was discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Norwegian Antarctic Territory (closed 11 days before the above comment) and there was consensus to keep a separate article on dependencies. Arsenikk (talk) 18:26, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Flag of New Swabia.svg Nominated for Deletion[edit]

Image-x-generic.svg An image used in this article, File:Flag of New Swabia.svg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests August 2011
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 19:23, 17 August 2011 (UTC)