Talk:Diet Coke and Mentos eruption
|This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Diet Coke and Mentos eruption article.|
|This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:|
Mentos are hard to come by in the UK, and I would imagine other countries outside of north America. Has anyone tried this with a substitute candy such as might be readily available in other countries such as the UK? If so how did it compare to the Mentos? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 126.96.36.199 (talk) 00:20, 9 February 2007 (UTC).
I tried to use skittles and starburst but it turned out really bad. Plus you can order mentos online @ their website.-March 2007
- Says mythbusters: table salt also works. 188.8.131.52 15:04, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
- Mentos originally come from the Netherlands and have been widely available in Europe long before they made it to the US - maybe this once more shows that the UK is indeed, despite all reason, not part of Europe? *scnr* --184.108.40.206 (talk) 12:59, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
I was trying to find out what reaction occurs between the mentos and the diet soda. This article claims that CO2 is released. Really? How do we know this? This article is a big load of crap. We don't need "theories" we need test results. I got 5 bucks says Carbon and Oxygen are split from the CO2 molecule in the soda causing the rapid expansion. Why do I think this? Because if you do this reaction and add heat there's a combustion reaction. CO2 doesn't explode, oxygen does. Mythbusters isn't the best source of information to be citing. This article is useless to anyone trying to learn about what it is that actually happens when you put mentos into diet soda. They might as well just link to the youtube videos. Mojination (talk) 19:36, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
- Well, a few ideas here. First, I would have to imagine to Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change would be very interested in this if you were right... All of the sources cited (not just Mythbusters) point to nucleation as a primary cause. None of them point to a chemical reaction (which, in your theory, seems to be occurring without any thermal changes...). Additionally, having seen this done, I don't know where all of that carbon would be going, as the soda after the eruption tastes like flat soda (no hint of pure carbon) and carbon gas certainly is not involved at near STP conditions. We have nothing showing this supposed combustion reaction. - SummerPhD (talk) 20:41, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
The article quote Mythbusters results when fruit-flavored Mentos with a smooth waxy coating were tested in carbonated drink there was hardly a reaction, whereas mint-flavored Mentos (with no such coating) added to carbonated drink formed an energetic eruption. But the Science of Mentos-Diet Coke explosions explained article from New Scientist says Another factor is that the coatings of Mentos contain gum arabic, a surfactant that further reduces surface tension in the liquid. Rough-surfaced mints without the surfactant did not create such large fountains. These two quotes seems to be in direct contradiction. Are US Mentos the same as EU Mentos? I bougt some EU Fruit Mentos today to try this for myself. The ingredients include glazing agents (carnauba wax, beeswax). Can anyone comment on US Mentos? 220.127.116.11 (talk) 22:33, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
Soda and candy eruption → ? – Diet Coke and Mentos eruption was the original name as this is what seems most commonly used experiment. It was moved to the current Soda and candy eruption title without discussion due to non-comercialism. I am thinking either back to its original title or Coke and confectionery eruption as a more neutral title. Simply south...... creating lakes for 5 years 20:54, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
- I just moved it back. It was done as a followup to MacRusgail's campaign above claiming that the product mentions are advertising, which received no support and ample disagreement. It was originally moved contrary to consensus some 8 months after that discussion. If MacRusgail disagrees, no problem for him to try to get consensus for a move to something else. In the unlikely event that that happens I'll be happy to do that move as well.
- The article does need more coverage of other ways to produce this reaction, though, since it is true that it is not limited to those two products. Perhaps someone could do the useful work of researching sources for that and adding more content? Jamesday (talk) 05:07, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
- Support the original title, Diet Coke and Mentos eruption. Normally I'm a big proponent of not using commercial names in articles, but in this case it is so clearly the common name that I don't think many people would know what an article on Soda and candy eruption would even be about. Jenks24 (talk) 05:34, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
Does more Mentos produce a bigger geyser? Because of the mentos' porous surface, it creates CO2 in bubbles, so, in turn, "spits" it out. So, does more Mentos create more CO2 bubbles because of all the Mentos' porous surfaces combined, more or less?
I came to this article hoping for a history section. How long has this been known about? When was the first reference? It seems like everyone became aware of it about 6 or 7 years ago, but before then it was unheard of. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 18.104.22.168 (talk) 00:39, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
|Off topic chat|
Diet Coke works better , I would speculate, because Diet Coke is demonstrably less dense than regular Coke due to having no sugar content. There is a famous demonstration which shows that a can of Diet Coke will float in water, while a can of regular Coke sinks. Certainly, given equal force generated by the pressure of the expanding CO2, the less-dense (and therefore less massive) fluid would travel further into the atmosphere, producing a more spectacular show. Applejuicefool (talk) 19:46, 25 September 2014 (UTC)