Talk:Digital delay line

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted on 22 August 2007 by reviewer Graeme Bartlett (talk · contribs).

Electronics Stub‑class Low‑importance

	Electronics portal This article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk pageElectronicsWikipedia:WikiProject ElectronicsTemplate:WikiProject Electronicselectronic articles
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lead paragraph[edit]

You say that the digital delay line 'is a discrete element in digital filter theory'. It seems that it is only a theoretical signal processing element, without any connection to real applications. Nevertheless, at the end of your article you have a paragraph ('Commercial history') where It is evident that some applications are in use. I would make clear in the initial definition that these elements are not only theoretically modelled, but used in practice. Gps1810 (talk) 13:26, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is true that it is virtually non-existant standalone as application, but always as a component to some other more complex scheme. So, theoretically, being a mainly theoretical element is true. Finding good sources that explicitly mention this type of delay lines as component in current commercial products could be a good future addition! Magiwanders (talk) 14:54, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

General comment[edit]

The article conveys the message. However, I have the feeling that it is oriented only to somehow expert readers. I am sure that the Theory paragraph is needed as it is, but it might be useful to expand the practical application side, to make it more accessible to a larger audience. Gps1810 (talk) 13:34, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That section is the original article, I added the theory, which is arguably something that you encounter only if you study it as engineer, never from the other side, that of musicians. So yes, it absolutely makes sense that there should be a thorough research on the products currently on the market implementing it, it would make the topic more accessible. Magiwanders (talk) 14:56, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Review[edit]

Nice work in summing up all the interpolation techniques and it's very nice to have a complemetary article to the one I wrote. I don't have many comments since we discussed them beforehand. Primoh (talk) 14:37, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]