This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. Please participate by editing the article Dignāga, or visit the project page for more details on the projects.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
"Therefore the example premise above, "all dogs are mammals" becomes "all non-mammals are non-dogs." These two statements are logically equivalent. "
The statements are not equivalent within the traditional logic systems of the sub-continent as those systems explicitly reject the law of the excluded middle. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.127.116.11 (talk) 13:15, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
I cannot imagine a wiki page being called complete which does not include something about Dignaga and language given language's place as the building blocks of thought. I may add something to the article, possibly comparing to Wittgenstein, and give notice for comment. Cheeryble (talk) 20:15, 31 October 2013 (UTC)