Talk:Discursive psychology

Criticisms

There are no criticisms of discursive psychology, see for example Ian Parker's work. This article draws heavily on earlier work in discursive psychology and does not meet recent trends and development, as a result of those critiques. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.231.129.49 (talk) 10:59, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Further reading section

Er...........do we actually need QUITE so many entries in the further reading section?

Six is too many from which to choose? -DoctorW 16:40, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

The reading list seems sound and helpful to me. Which ones are you proposing should be deleted and why? Too many, seems to me to be a very weak justification for deletion. Would you criticise a library for having to much to read for instance? It is not as if space is a limit here. What are you hoping to achieve through your comment here? 14:35, 8 November 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.250.130.175 (talk)

Contrast with cognitivist approaches

I would like to see the paragraph which consists only of the sentence; "It is philosophically opposed to more traditional cognitivist approaches to language." become a whole section that spells out what the differences are, comparing and contrasting. -DoctorW 16:40, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

It would be helpful if you would expand on your wishes, for instance providing some information on those matters from the research you have carried out yourslf into the matter. Perhaps then an editor could pull them together here for you. 84.250.130.175 (talk) 14:31, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Discursive psychology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110902191918/http://www-staff.lboro.ac.uk/%7Essde/Potter%20Edwards%20DSP%20New%20Hanbook%20SP%202001.pdf to http://www-staff.lboro.ac.uk/~ssde/potter%20edwards%20dsp%20new%20hanbook%20sp%202001.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:31, 1 December 2017 (UTC)