Talk:Diya Aur Baati Hum

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Soap Operas

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soap Operas, an effort to build consistent guidelines for and improve articles about soap operas and telenovelas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit WikiProject Soap Operas, where you can join the project and/or the discussion.Soap OperasWikipedia:WikiProject Soap OperasTemplate:WikiProject Soap Operassoap opera articles

India: Television Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian television workgroup (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article was last assessed in August 2020.

References and Plot[edit]

I've tagged the article as having way too much plot and way too few references. Wikipedia has some basic rules about article content. One of the most important is that the content of articles is verifiable by readers. This means the information in articles must come from specific reliable sources and the reader must be able to refer back to those sources to see where the information came from. Articles must not contain original research - which means they cannot be the opinions of the editors.

In addition, this article has way too much plot detail. Please refer to WP:PLOT that says that Wikipedia articles must be "Summary-only descriptions of works". See also Wikipedia's manual of style which says that "The length of a plot summary should be carefully balanced with the length of the other sections. Strictly avoid creating pages consisting only of a plot summary". This article clearly has way too much plot summary, none of which is referenced.

Would interested editors please address these issues. The plot section should be reduced to one or two short paragraphs and all unreferenced material could be removed at any time. Please address these issues, or I or another uninvolved editor will likely do so soon. Thanks, Sparthorse (talk) 08:25, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed[edit]

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://starplus.startv.in/characters.aspx?sid=134. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 11:18, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Number of episodes?[edit]

What on earth is going on with the |num_episodes= field?

1487 (21 minutes)

744 (42 minutes)

585 (55 minutes)

495 (65 minutes)

372 (85 minutes)

297 (100 minutes)

641 (Vietnam episodes)

What the heck does any of this mean? The field should contain a single number indicating how many unique episodes were produced. Are we trying to say that 4621 episodes were made? Or that 1487 episodes were repackaged in various ways? Who knows. The infobox is not intended to be a repository for excessive (and vague) detail like this. That's why we create Episode sections and explain things in prose. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:29, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Diya Aur Baati Hum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121028030742/http://www.media247.co.uk/bizasia/indian-telly-awards-2012-winners to http://www.media247.co.uk/bizasia/indian-telly-awards-2012-winners

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:54, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]